Mesothelioma research has produced substantial treatment advances in recent years. Checkpoint inhibitor drugs (ICIs) have improved survival and quality of life for many mesothelioma patients. ICIs have also helped at least one patient go from ineligible to eligible for surgery.
Significant mesothelioma treatment advances like ICIs are built upon extensive research. This includes many studies that are considered failures. Drugs often look promising in early tests but fail to deliver in larger studies. Still, even unsuccessful studies provide valuable insights for mesothelioma doctors and researchers. They tell oncologists which treatments to avoid. These studies also point researchers toward more promising therapies.
To shed a bit more light on these unsung but important studies, we’ve compiled the list below. It includes experimental treatments that did not progress to clinical use for mesothelioma. In general, these drugs do not directly help mesothelioma patients. But research into them helped pave the way for key improvements in mesothelioma prognosis.
Cediranib Results for Mesothelioma
- Drug description: Cediranib belongs to a class of drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors. It interferes with signals that help mesothelioma cells and the blood vessels that supply them grow.
- Why it failed: Researchers noted cediranib was very toxic to patients and had only a small effect. They encouraged other scientists to look into different classes of drugs for mesothelioma.
A 2012 study shared the results of cediranib treatment for pleural mesothelioma:
- Median progression-free survival: 1.8 months
- Median overall survival: 4.4 months
Researchers also reported a high rate of serious side effects.
Iressa® (Gefitinib) Results for Mesothelioma
- Drug description: Iressa belongs to a class of drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors. It interferes with signals that help mesothelioma cells grow and spread.
- Why it failed: In early studies, Iressa showed promising activity in killing mesothelioma cells. But in at least one larger study, it did not improve survival.
A 2005 study shared the results of Iressa treatment for pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma:
- 1-year survival: 32%
- Median overall survival: 6.8 months
The study included 42 patients with pleural mesothelioma and one with peritoneal.
Nexavar® (Sorafenib) Results for Mesothelioma
- Drug description: Nexavar belongs to a class of drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors. It interferes with signals that help mesothelioma cells and the blood vessels that supply them grow.
- Why it failed: According to researchers, Nexavar showed “limited activity” for mesothelioma. They encouraged other scientists to investigate different types of drugs for mesothelioma.
A 2010 study reported the results of Nexavar treatment for mesothelioma:
- Median progression-free survival: 3.6 months
- Median overall survival: 9.7 months
Fatigue was the most commonly reported side effect. Some patients stopped treatment because of other severe side effects.
Ofev® (Nintedanib) Results for Mesothelioma
- Drug description: Ofev belongs to a class of drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors. It interferes with signals that help mesothelioma cells and the blood vessels that supply them grow.
- Why it failed: Experts say Ofev and drugs like it have not significantly improved mesothelioma survival. The most recent trial was suspended mid-study because of a lack of efficacy.
The most recent related study looked at standard chemotherapy with or without Ofev. It found the following median progression-free survival outcomes for mesothelioma:
- Chemotherapy + Ofev: 6.8 months
- Chemotherapy: 7 months
The study authors found no differences in other outcomes, including overall survival and symptom severity.
Sprycel® (Dasatinib) Results for Mesothelioma
- Drug description: Sprycel belongs to a class of drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors. It interferes with signals that help mesothelioma cells and the blood vessels that supply them grow.
- Why it failed: Experts say Sprycel shows “no activity” in treating mesothelioma. It also comes with “unfavorable toxicity.” Researchers did not encourage the study of Sprycel for mesothelioma.
A 2012 study reported the results of Sprycel treatment for mesothelioma:
- Median progression-free survival: 9 weeks
- Median overall survival: 26 weeks
Patients treated with a higher dose of Sprycel also experienced a high rate of serious side effects.
Tarceva® (Erlotinib) Results for Mesothelioma
- Drug description: Tarceva belongs to a class of drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors. It interferes with signals known to help mesothelioma cells grow.
- Why it failed: Early research indicated Tarceva held promise for treating mesothelioma. But researchers found it was not effective in practice. They think mesothelioma cells may not be susceptible to Tarceva.
A 2007 study reported the results of Tarceva treatment for mesothelioma:
- Median progression-free survival: 2 months
- Median overall survival: 10 months
Study authors said Tarceva’s efficacy in treating mesothelioma was not clinically relevant.
Tomudex® (Raltitrexed) Results for Mesothelioma
- Drug description: Tomudex is a chemotherapy drug. It works similarly to Alimta® (pemetrexed), a standard chemo drug for mesothelioma.
- Why it failed: Data indicates Tomudex works fine for mesothelioma. Experts say it is comparable to Alimta when used alongside cisplatin. But the drug manufacturer never got approval of Tomudex in the United States.
A 2005 study looked into cisplatin with or without Tomudex for mesothelioma. It found the following median overall survival outcomes:
- Cisplatin: 8.8 months
- Cisplatin + Tomudex: 11.4 months
In a similar trial of pemetrexed, mesothelioma patients lived about 12 months. So Tomudex and pemetrexed have similar efficacy for mesothelioma.
Sutent® Sunitinib Results for Mesothelioma
- Drug description: Sutent belongs to a class of drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors. It interferes with signals that help mesothelioma cells and the blood vessels that supply them grow.
- Why it failed: Early laboratory data indicated Sutent might work well against mesothelioma. But researchers found it did not help patients much, if at all.
A 2011 study reported the results of Sutent for previously untreated mesothelioma:
- Median progression-free survival: 2.7 months
- Median overall survival: 6.7 months
The authors said more research into Sutent treatment on its own is not necessary.
Sources
Campbell NP, Kunnavakkam R, et al. Cediranib in patients with malignant mesothelioma: a phase II trial of the University of Chicago Phase II Consortium. Lung Cancer. October 2012;78(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.06.011
Cinausero M, Rihawi K, et al. Chemotherapy treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a difficult history. Journal of Thoracic Disease. January 2018;10(Suppl 2):S304-S310. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.19
Cowen L. No benefit with nintedanib in advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma. Medicine Matters® oncology. May 2019.
Dubey S, Jänne PA, et al. A phase II study of sorafenib in malignant mesothelioma: results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B 30307. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. October 2010;5(10):1655-1661. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec18db
Dudek AZ, Pang H, et al. Phase II study of dasatinib in patients with previously treated malignant mesothelioma (cancer and leukemia group B 30601): a brief report. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. April 2012;7(4):755-759. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318248242c
Garland LL, Rankin C, et al. Phase II study of erlotinib in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. June 2007;25(17):2406-2413. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7634
Govindan R, Kratzke RA, et al. Gefitinib in patients with malignant mesothelioma: a phase II study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Clinical Cancer Research. March 200515;11(6):2300-2304. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1940
Grosso F, Steele N, et al. Nintedanib Plus Pemetrexed/Cisplatin in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Phase II Results From the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled LUME-Meso Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. November 2017;35(31):3591-3600. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.9012
Hiddinga BI, Rolfo C, et al. Mesothelioma treatment: Are we on target? A review. Journal of Advanced Research. May 2015;6(3):319-330. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2014.11.012
Kotova S, Wong RM, et al. New and emerging therapeutic options for malignant pleural mesothelioma: review of early clinical trials. Cancer Management and Research. January 2015;7:51-63. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S72814
Laurie SA, Gupta A, et al. Brief report: a phase II study of sunitinib in malignant pleural mesothelioma. The NCIC Clinical Trials Group. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. November 2011;6(11):1950-1954. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182333df5
Maio M and Calabrò L. The future of mesothelioma treatment: time to shift gear. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. July 2019;7(7):554-555. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30171-7
Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. Phase 3 LUME-Meso trial in malignant pleural mesothelioma doesn’t improve progression-free survival. June 2019.
Nowak AK, Millward MJ, et al. A phase II study of intermittent sunitinib malate as second-line therapy in progressive malignant pleural mesothelioma. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. September 2012;7(9):1449-1456. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31825f22ee
Scagliotti GV, Gaafar R, et al. Nintedanib in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (LUME-Meso): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. July 2019;7(7):569-580. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30139-0
Tsao AS, Miao J, et al. Phase II Trial of Cediranib in Combination With Cisplatin and Pemetrexed in Chemotherapy-Naïve Patients With Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (SWOG S0905). Journal of Clinical Oncology. October 2019;37(28):2537-2547. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00269
van Meerbeeck JP, Gaafar R, et al. Randomized phase III study of cisplatin with or without raltitrexed in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: an intergroup study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group and the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Journal of Clinical Oncology. October 2005;23(28):6881-6889. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20005.14.589
Free Mesothelioma Treatment Guide
Katy Moncivais, Ph.D., has more than 15 years of experience as a medical communicator. As the Medical Editor at Mesothelioma.com, she ensures our pages and posts present accurate, helpful information.