Extrapleural Pneumonectomy
Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) is a surgical procedure that treats pleural mesothelioma. It removes the impacted lung, the linings of the lung and heart, and the diaphragm. EPP is usually part of a multimodal treatment plan. Patients often receive chemo and radiation after surgery.
Learn More About Extrapleural Pneumonectomy in Our Free Guide
Learn About Extrapleural Pneumonectomy in Our Free Guide
What Is an Extrapleural Pneumonectomy?
Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) is a surgical procedure that treats pleural mesothelioma. It removes:
- Both layers of the lining around the lung (the pleura)
- The affected lung
- Part or all of the diaphragm
- Any affected part of the lining around the heart (the pericardium)
In the past, candidates for EPP consisted only of patients in good health with early-stage mesothelioma. But new research has changed this. Patients with operable Stage 1, Stage 2 or Stage 3 mesothelioma generally undergo a different surgery. Doctors now generally reserve EPP for those with later-stage tumors that have spread from the pleura into the lung itself.
Surgical intervention will give a mesothelioma patient the greatest chance of long-term survival.
Vincent Mase, MD
How Does Extrapleural Pneumonectomy Treat Mesothelioma?
The goal of mesothelioma surgeries, including EPP, is to remove all visible cancer in a patient’s body. This can improve prognosis by minimizing the number of tumor cells.
EPP is usually part of a multimodal treatment plan. It is often combined with other therapies like chemotherapy and radiation. These treatments may be administered before or after EPP. Pre-surgery therapies are designed to boost the effectiveness of EPP. Post-surgery therapies help kill tumor cells left behind by EPP.
Combination treatments that include EPP generally improve life expectancy better than EPP alone.
The Extrapleural Pneumonectomy Procedure
EPP is offered at mesothelioma cancer centers where thoracic surgeons often specialize in the procedure. Patients go under general anesthesia for an EPP. Then a surgeon accesses the chest cavity and removes as much tumor tissue as possible. This includes the linings of the lung and heart and affected parts of the diaphragm.
The procedure steps may vary between hospitals and surgeons. But EPP procedure steps generally include:
- The patient is placed under general anesthesia.
- The surgeon makes an incision to open the chest cavity (a thoracotomy). It usually goes from the chest, under the armpit and around to the patient’s back. In some cases, the surgeon may need to remove a rib to access the affected area.
- The surgeon removes tumors and some of the tissue around them. This includes the affected lung and the lining around it. The surgeon also takes out the sac around the heart (pericardium) and any cancerous parts of the diaphragm.
- The surgeon removes lymph nodes in the affected side of the chest.
- The surgeon repairs the diaphragm and pericardium with an implantable fabric.
Patients stay in the hospital for 1 – 2 weeks after surgery. Healthcare providers monitor patients closely during this time.
Recovery From Extrapleural Pneumonectomy
Immediately after surgery, patients need a great deal of care and assistance. Within weeks, they need less medical supervision and can continue recovering at home. So extrapleural pneumonectomy recovery happens in two stages:
- In-hospital: This stage happens right after surgery and usually lasts about 2 weeks.
- At-home: This stage occurs after the patient is released from the hospital. It often takes 1.5 – 3 months, but some patients may need longer to feel recovered.
During the at-home recovery phase, patients may notice some changes in their bodies. They may feel more tired than usual or need to take breaks from physical activities. Patients may also have soreness or irritation in the operated area.
Experts say patients can ease the recovery process by closely following their doctors’ orders. This means avoiding doctor-prohibited activities and going to all check-up appointments. Patients can also benefit from consistently doing their physical therapy and breathing exercises.
Heather Von St. James had an EPP surgery in early 2006. Some of the challenges she faced related to unrealistic expectations about recovery. Her surgeon told her she would be “back behind the chair, working in the salon” within 3 months of surgery. Heather’s experience was quite different.
“I was still like an infant [at that point]. I could hardly function. There was no way I could work a full-time job out of the house.”
Heather says EPP recovery takes much longer than you think it will. So it’s important to be patient, trust the process and not rush it.
Extrapleural Pneumonectomy Survival Rates and Prognosis
In studies, prognosis after EPP surgery with other therapies ranges from 11 to 51 months. The high end of this range is about 4 times the usual survival for mesothelioma treated with chemo alone. Many factors can influence prognosis after EPP. These include patient health, tumor cell type and treatment details.
In one study, pleural mesothelioma patients received multimodal treatment. First, they underwent radiation targeted to the affected lung. Then, within 5 days, they had EPP surgery.
Median survival for all study patients was about 2 years. But it was nearly 4 years for patients with epithelioid tumors. With EPP-based treatment, epithelioid tumors generally have better prognoses than other cell types.
| 1-Year Survival | 2-Year Survival | 3-Year Survival | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPP surgery | 52% | 34% | 21% |
| Chemo + EPP | 56% | 29% | 17% |
| EPP + radiation | 66% | 39% | 22% |
| Chemo + EPP + radiation | 76% | 51% | 37% |
Source: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Patients can discuss the factors that influence EPP survival with their oncologists. Doctors can explain how individual and tumor characteristics may affect prognosis.
How Do Survival Rates for Extrapleural Pneumonectomy and Pleurectomy/Decortication Compare?
EPP and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) are the primary surgical options for pleural mesothelioma. P/D is considered less aggressive than EPP because it does not remove the patient’s lung. For many years, this difference led people to believe EPP was the better option. But prognosis outcomes for EPP and P/D have changed this notion in recent years.
A few trials have compared survival for mesothelioma patients treated with EPP or P/D surgeries. Study patients undergoing P/D lived 1 – 2 years longer than those undergoing EPP. The survival difference is more pronounced in some trials than others.
For example, one research group looked at pleural mesothelioma patients treated with:
- EPP: This group received systemic chemotherapy + EPP + radiation.
- P/D: This group received P/D + HITHOC (heated chemo for the chest cavity) + systemic chemotherapy.
The EPP group had a median survival of 2 years. The P/D group had a median survival of just over 3 years. Results like these contributed to the recent shift in pleural mesothelioma surgery trends. In the past, EPP may have been more common. But in the last 5 – 10 years, P/D has overtaken EPP, becoming the more standard surgical option.
Learn About Financial Assistance Available for Treatment Costs Learn more with our free information packet Get Help NowAdvantages of Extrapleural Pneumonectomy
EPP may improve survival and quality of life for some pleural mesothelioma patients. Potential benefits of EPP surgery include:
- Improve quality of life: EPP surgery may ease breathing problems, boosting quality of life.
- Helps with tumors that extend into the lung: EPP can remove mesothelioma cancer that has spread into the lung.
- May offer a better chance of long-term cure: EPP may have a slightly higher rate of long-term remission than P/D.
The main thing to keep in mind is that EPP may offer greater advantages for patients with more extensive tumors. For example, when mesothelioma cancer spreads into the lung, it can cause serious problems. P/D surgeries leave behind such tumors because they leave the lung in place. Since EPP removes the lung, it has a better chance of helping patients with this type of advanced tumor.
In 2005, Heather Von St. James was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma. She had an initial prognosis of 15 months. She traveled to Boston to undergo treatment with mesothelioma specialist Dr. David Sugarbaker. Heather underwent EPP surgery with heated chemotherapy. She also later underwent multiple rounds of chemotherapy and radiation. Today, Heather is a survivor of 20+ years, and she continues to advocate for the mesothelioma community.
Extrapleural Pneumonectomy Risks and Complications
As with any surgery, short- and long-term side effects are possible with EPP. Patient factors and treatment details can affect complication severity and duration.
- Arrhythmia (abnormal heartbeat)
- Blood clots
- Bronchopleural fistula (abnormal connection between the airways in the lungs and the pleura)
- Fluid buildup in the lungs
- Infection
- Internal bleeding
- Pneumonia
- Pus accumulation in the pleural space
- Shortness of breath
Research indicates EPP surgeries carry higher risks than P/D surgeries. This includes risks for serious complications and death. Across studies, patients were more likely to die undergoing EPP compared to P/D. The risk of death with EPP was more than twice that of P/D in at least one trial.
Other EPP disadvantages reported in medical literature include:
- Decreased heart-lung function: EPP can reduce a person’s heart-lung function. This can make breathing difficult and make patients feel more tired than normal.
- Potentially lower quality of life: Some patients may have a lower quality of life after EPP than before.
- Reduced tolerance for later cancer therapies: EPP can make patients less able to withstand treatments like chemotherapy. This may mean patients have fewer treatment options if mesothelioma comes back.
Interested patients should talk to their oncologists about the risks and benefits of EPP surgery. Experienced surgeons can explain how these considerations apply to a patient’s unique case.
Who Is Eligible for Extrapleural Pneumonectomy?
In the past, EPP eligibility was restricted to patients in good health with early-stage cancer. But EPP’s high risk of death and serious complications changed this. Currently, EPP is reserved for later-stage cancer patients with tumors that extend into the lung. They must also be healthy enough to withstand surgery.
Doctors may consider lung function and tumor cell type when determining eligibility. Patients with expected post-surgery lung function of 40% or greater may be EPP candidates. Those with sarcomatoid tumors may not be candidates.
Patients who are not EPP candidates may be eligible for P/D or other treatments. Doctors can go over the treatment options and explain which might benefit an individual patient most.
Common Questions About Extrapleural Pneumonectomy for Mesothelioma
What is the difference between pleurectomy and extrapleural pneumonectomy?
What is a patient’s life expectancy after an extrapleural pneumonectomy?
How much does an extrapleural pneumonectomy cost?
A recent study found the average cost of extrapleural pneumonectomy was $62,408 in 2014. In 2023, this would amount to about $82,000. Some or all of this cost may be covered by insurance, depending on a person’s policy.
Mesothelioma patients may have other options for covering treatment costs. Asbestos lawsuits and trust fund claims can provide compensation for people injured by asbestos exposure. Patients interested in these options should speak to a mesothelioma attorney.
Sources
Azzouqa A-G and Stevenson JP. The evolution of the diminishing role of extrapleural pneumonectomy in the surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Onco Targets and Therapy. November 2016;9:7247-7252. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S100214
Batirel HF. Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) vs. pleurectomy decortication (P/D). Annals of Translational Medicine. June 2017;5(11):232. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.82
Borrelli E, Babcock Z, et al. Costs of medical care for mesothelioma. Rare Tumors. July 2019;11. doi: 10.1177/2036361319863498
Bueno R, Opitz I, et al. Surgery in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. November 2018;13(11):1638-1654. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.001
Cao C, Tian D, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical treatments for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Lung Cancer. February 2014;83(2):P240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.11.026
Cao C, Yan TD, et al. Summary of prognostic factors and patient selection for extrapleural pneumonectomy in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Annals of Surgical Oncology. October 2011;18(10):2973-2979. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1728-x
Domen A, Berzenji L, et al. Extrapleural pneumonectomy: still indicated? Translational Lung Cancer Research. October 2018;7(5):550-555. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.07.07
Duranti L, Pardolesi A, et al. Extra-pleural pneumonectomy. Journal of Thoracic Disease. March 2019;11(3):1022-1030. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.61
Hasegawa S. Extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma. General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. March 2014;62(9):516-521. doi: 10.1007/s11748-014-0389-7
Jhavar S, Pruszynski J, et al. Intensity modulated radiation therapy after extra-pleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma is feasible without fatal pulmonary toxicity and provides good survival. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology. April 2018;14(2):e88-e94. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12680
Klotz LV, Hoffmann H, et al. Multimodal therapy of epithelioid pleural mesothelioma: improved survival by changing the surgical treatment approach. Translational Lung Cancer Research. November 2022;11(11):2230-2242. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-199
Lang-Lazdunski L, Bille A, et al. Pleurectomy/Decortication is Superior to Extrapleural Pneumonectomy in the Multimodality Management of Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. April 2012;7(4):P737-743. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31824ab6c5
Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, et al. Updated meta-analysis of survival after extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy/decortication in mesothelioma. General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. March 2019;67(3):312-320. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-1027-6
Nakamura A and Kuribayashi K. Do we still need to debate the merits of pleurectomy/decortication vs. extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma? Translational Lung Cancer Research. February 2023;12(2):193-196. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-24
Neragi-Miandoab S. Multimodality approach in management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. January 2006;29(1):14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.10.008
Popat S, Baas P, et al. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up☆. Annals of Oncology. February 2022;33(2):129-142. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.005
Rusch VW. Pleurectomy and Decortication: How I Teach It. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. May 2017;103(5):1374–1377. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.02.042
Spaggiari L, Marulli G, et al. Extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant mesothelioma: an Italian multicenter retrospective study. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. June 2014;97(6):1859-1865. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.01.050
Sugarbaker DJ, Jaklitsch MT, et al. Prevention, early detection, and management of complications after 328 consecutive extrapleural pneumonectomies. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. July 2004;128(1):138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.02.021
Sugarbaker DJ. Macroscopic Complete Resection: The Goal of Primary Surgery in Multimodality Therapy for Pleural Mesothelioma. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. February 2006;1(2):P175-176. doi: 10.1016/S1556-0864(15)31536-7
Treasure T, Lang-Lazdunski L, et al. Extra-pleural pneumonectomy versus no extra-pleural pneumonectomy for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: clinical outcomes of the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery (MARS) randomised feasibility study. The Lancet Oncology. August 2011;12(8):763-772. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70149-8
Van Schil PE, Opitz I, et al. Multimodal management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: where are we today? European Respiratory Journal. September 2014;44(3):754-764. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00207213
Verma V, Ahern CA, et al. National Cancer Database Report on Pneumonectomy Versus Lung-Sparing Surgery for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. November 2017;12(11):1704-1714. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.08.012
Free Mesothelioma Treatment Guide
Katy Moncivais, Ph.D., has more than 15 years of experience as a medical communicator. As the Medical Editor at Mesothelioma.com, she ensures our pages and posts present accurate, helpful information.
Dr. Francis Perry Wilson is the Director of the Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator at the Yale University School of Medicine. He specializes in nephrology and clinical research.